Curtis Gorham v. Michael Alan Jenkins, et al.

QUESTIONS > Question (1) I became “mentally ill” in 2007 according to Social Security Disability. (See, Exhibits J & K). Apparently I'm entitled to “civil private counsel” I am herein “abused and exploited” by this infringement on my rights and immunity, Constitutional guarantees as a persons determined incapacitated and also indigent. See; Table Of Cited Authorities (Part A). > Question (2) Since I'm “mentally ill” shouldn't my filing of motions to the court for petition and civil counsel and guardians be considered and the courts going beyond that is the cause of all these problems warranting remanding? See; Table Of Cited Authorities (Part B). > Question (3) Plaintiff's Florida Supreme Court Motions For Writ Of Mandamus & Injunctive Relief on page 1 stated; I seek a writ of mandamus from the Florida Supreme Court in order to ensure that the defense counsels and the medical experts involved are investigated for the actions in this litigation such that it is all “fraud.” I also seek that the Judges involved are also investigated and their decisions set aside. This may be injunctive relief to enjoin the Judges or a Writ of Mandamus to direct whoever would be responsible to see the Judge “step down” or are disciplined. I will state things very clearly that the experts are not at all in any form addressing the “conspiracy” and “medical battery” that has taken place to me. The failure of the experts to address that as part of their “investigation” is only capable of being “fraud” and “perjury.” Second, the defense counsels are thus doing “fraud upon the court.” The 1st DCA of Florida is making incorrect decisions. lof 29