Christopher J. Rahaim v. Nancy M. Ley, former Judge, Sixth Judicial Circuit of Florida, et al.

Is the deprivation of due process rights, in underlying state criminal litigation, exempt from the civil prisoner litigation clause 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) in 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims filed in lieu of habeas corpus petitions?

Does established law protect and enforce rights violated by vague, ambiguous, conflicting state legislation and prolonged ex-parte influence?

Does established Federal and International laws enforce the right to a fair speedy trial and correct the deprivation of the right, perpetrated through trickery, deceit, extrinsic fraud depriving face to face confrontation, material evidence of impeachability, actual innocence?

Does the deprivation of self-representation/access to courts, with the purpose of preventing challenges to rights violations, entitle the victim, through established law, to review of the disqualified challenges and or dismissal of criminal charges and release from custody?