Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mary Martha McComas v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-4900 · judgment September 24, 2024
Certiorari denied · November 10, 2025
Question presented
Whether when denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must provide a reason for that denial (as held by the Third, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits), or whether a district court need not provide a justifying reason when denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint if that reason is apparent from an analysis of the record (as held by the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits.)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Mary Martha McComas
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Nov 03 2025Supplemental brief of petitioner Mary Martha McComas filed. (Distributed)
- Oct 23 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Dec 18 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)