Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mary Martha McComas v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-4900 · judgment September 24, 2024


Certiorari denied · November 10, 2025

Question presented

Whether when denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint, a district court must provide a reason for that denial (as held by the Third, Seventh, Ninth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits), or whether a district court need not provide a justifying reason when denying a pro se litigant leave to amend the complaint if that reason is apparent from an analysis of the record (as held by the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Tenth Circuits.)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Mary Martha McComas

For respondent

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Nov 10 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 03 2025
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Mary Martha McComas filed. (Distributed)
  3. Oct 23 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
  4. Dec 18 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 10, 2025)