Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ramel Drew v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 23-3931, 23-3932 · judgment April 18, 2025
Certiorari denied · October 20, 2025
Question presented
Whether the Pinkerton theory of coconspirator liability jury instruction can be provided in a case when the Indictment does not allege a criminal conspiracy. PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING The parties appearing here and below are: (1) Ramel Drew, the Petitioner named in the caption; and (2) the United States, the Respondent named in the caption. No corporations are involved in this proceeding.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marisa Larrick Serrat
Jaime P. Serrat LLC
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 20 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 02 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
- Sep 24 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Sep 02 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 6, 2025)