Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jessie Smith, III v. United States

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-471 · judgment April 10, 2025

Certiorari denied · October 14, 2025

Question presented

Does the Due Process Clause require that district courts apply the constitutional safeguards of Brady v. Maryland when a defendant faces a revocation of supervised release based on allegations of new and unproven criminal conduct? prefix

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Ryan W Stitt
Stitt Vu Trial Lawyers APC

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

Oct 14 2025
Petition DENIED.
Sep 25 2025
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
Sep 23 2025
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
Main Document
Aug 25 2025
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2025)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis Petition Appendix Certificate of Word Count Proof of Service