Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Olamide Olatayo Bello
IFP petition
Question presented
Question CM Whether the Gwemowit □r^uawt ttW Cf the district Court hud Hot €nter-ed O final Un a CnnninaJ Case nt m a hotous pretriUl final Jud^-eflnent Orders appeal Can Stan fl th-C Appe lla/fg^ CouM dccvsion ho dismiss On appeal whether a Writ of Mandamus IS a proper \Cerw to Chcdl-fnge flhe district Court's Improp-er denia/ Of Designation Of [Word on Appeals and after :he AypeUanfs Severed Motions Comp^lhny Orullbr W,ltesfin<y {W Designation Dt Record On fl-ppecds in Che Apppellcch’ Court Qnd District Cowl? Whether an Appellant that Proceeded On frpp-ecd Piro S-e Oriel Intention^ did So and Without a Course/ and (AUfMout Qnj notice <% Appearance fronn arug Counsel f and With Cl Motion andlbr Po-hce fo______ proceed Pro Se In th-? Appellate Courh, Present a, Question u(A/h-ethlr h^ (Yl&j Proceed Pro Se f/ Un The rppelicite Cuu^t hrespedu/e ofdhi DistrCcf feotts
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Olamide Olatayo Bello
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus/prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
- Oct 09 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Sep 23 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 22 2025Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 2, 2025)