Brian Troy Woltz v. Susan Good, et al.

Whether the lower courts, acting under statutory and de facto authority, committed reversible error in refusing to recognize or adjudicate matters grounded in equity, trust, and unrebutted sworn affidavits presented by a living man standing in private capacity as Executor-Beneficiary, thereby denying the sacred right of remedy in equity.

Whether the summary dismissal of a verified judicial misconduct complaint, followed by coordinated retaliation, procedural obstruction, and systemic suppression of filings across multiple jurisdictions, constitutes a structural denial of due process and meaningfill access to remedy, in violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Whether the repeated rejection, sealing, misclassification, or concealment of verified equity instruments and private trust filings amounts to an unconstitutional infringement of die Executor-Beneficiary ’s First Amendment right to petition, and violates the judiciary’s own duty to maintain an open, fair, and uncorrupted court of record.

Whether the Third Circuit and subordinate courts, by refusing to address the merits of trust claims, equitable declarations, and unrebutted affidavits—dismissing them as “frivolous” without evidentiary hearing—breached their solemn judicial oaths under 28 U.S.C. § 453, and abandoned their constitutional duty to preserve equity and conscience.

Whether this Supreme Court is constitutionally obligated to exercise its ultimate equitable jurisdiction, where inferior tribunals have closed the doors of conscience, left no adequate remedy at law, and permitted unrebutted facts, trust claims, and fiduciary breaches to remain unaddressed, contrary to fundamental judicial maxims and the public trust