Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gregory D. Crosby aka Gregory D. Cosby v. Mistelle J. Starr, Warden, et al.
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 25-1095 · judgment July 31, 2025
Dismissed · October 20, 2025
Question presented
ipHed ho ABst 37vP Act 0 fed Vo A- ZU vVta>*g CIM»hT z) __ 33d €
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gregory D. Crosby
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Oct 20 2025The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam). Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
- Oct 14 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
- Sep 25 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/10/2025.
- Sep 23 2025Waiver of right of respondent Mistelle J. Starr, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
- Aug 22 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2025)