Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gary Eugene Maddox, II v. United States
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2025-1257 · judgment July 16, 2025
Questions presented
-
Did National Supreme Court clerk Danny Bickel violate Maddox’s right to petition the Government when he committed clerk obstruction, and fraud upon the court in the Supreme Court clerk’s office by misappropriating a document on May 14th 2024 in Maddox’s case, no. 23-759. By removing the substance and sworn declaration and then entering the evidence of the Extrinsic fraud onto the Supreme Court Docket ?
-
Can a federal judge disregard the Constitution ?
-
Maddox entered A motion to vacate void judgment due to Fraud upon court and invoked Rule 60 (b)(l-5) Did The Lower Court, Default in Application of Law by abuse of Discretion, after it chose to affirm the jurisdictional judgment of the lower tribunal, while knowing that the motion rule 60 (b) FRP gave the court full jurisdiction to correct the matter?
-
Can a federal three judge panel disregard request for Remand to S.C.O.T.U.S, while affirming the lower courts decision for lack of the subject matter jurisdiction ? if the United State court of appeals for the federal circuit did not have jurisdiction and a request was made to the court for remand the court must remand to the proper jurisdictional court ?
-
Can a federal judge disregard request for ad hoc inquiry ?
-
Did the lower courts apply jurisdiction correctly ? Page 2 of 12
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Gary Eugene Maddox
For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 02 2026Rehearing DENIED.
- Feb 11 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/27/2026.
- Oct 27 2025Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Oct 20 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 02 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
- Sep 24 2025Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 31 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 24, 2025)