Zephaniah S. Edwards v. Bland Management, et al.

Question I: Whether under Virginia Law, when determining the majority of motions for this case, can unfair, unjust and biased decisions be made by denying and not enforcing federal and state statutes be made by the Alexandria District Court to only support the defendants in their case. So that the defendants can have a favorable outcome where decisions are applicable. Question II; Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counsel respond to my Interrogatories and Production of Documents with refusals and oppositions without following the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, so that at the time presented, I would not have any valid answers that would have been needed to present or research my case properly. Question III: Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counsel ignore the Federal Rides of Civil Procedure, verbally expressing that he would not comply and would not respond to my timely submitted Admission document, per federal law and state law. Question IV: Whether under Virginia Law, can evidence in legal proceedings that is determined relevant, such as phone records, text messages, pay stubs, federal tax forms, time stamps, and declarations be deemed non-material facts when presenting evidence to Alexandria Federal Court and counsel representing the defendants in this case. Question V: Whether under Virginia Law, can the defendants counter claim in this case be ignored throughout the entire judicial process without Notice and