Jehan Semper v. Hawaii Life Real Estate Services, LLC, et al.

Constitutional and Civil Rights

1. Real Estate Agent(s) Refuse to Communicate Buyers Offer(s) to Seller(s). Is it a violation of rights protected by the constitution, civil rights and/or an act of religious discrimination when one or more real estate agents refuse to present a buyer’s offer because one or more of the buyer’s Section Q contingencies includes specifications based upon, and/or arising from, their required religious beliefs and practices? See Context of Questions Item 1 for description of specific events.

2. Real Estate Agent Says Vacant Lot is Not Available for Sale, NOT Saleable When the Lot is, in Fact, Available for Sale and Saleable. Is it a violation of rights protected by the constitution, civil rights and/or an act of religious discrimination when a real estate agent tells a buyer that a vacant lot is not available for sale and can not be bought when the vacant lot actually is available for sale and can be bought? See Context of Questions Item 2 for description ofspecific events. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

3. Did HUD err, abuse its discretion, act arbitrarily and/or capriciously or otherwise act and/or decide improperly when it decided that HUD did not have subject matter jurisdiction in the 703018 complaint [Appendix C. 1]?; and

4. Did HUD otherwise err, abuse its discretion, act arbitrarily and/or capriciously or otherwise act and/or decide improperly while considering the events Plaintiff reported in HUD Inquiry No. 703018? Semper v Hawaii Life Real Estate Services, LLC, et al H Petition for Writ of Certiorari