Neda Mehrabani v. United States

CO Whether a Certificate ot Appaalibi lity f'COA"} should have> been issued because Z Was denied a conddutncrvd rhjhtfo efcfive assistance ot counsel When -fndl counsel Withheld -from vne ttinf there was only 1 a(leaed viehm out ot hundreds in discovery that claimed I did not provide <dI the sevuoss that Z billed Medicare todenied and lied tr? about discovery Which tz> date Z have not received) (. ) Whether Counsel provided inetfe<dire dsoistance ctcounsel te prDvntssd Vne probation or community senrice/ it Z P . ^p^try and it Z Wentfo) tndl Z would ao to* uril. which was a ^45 Z pled auilty 4nd wentto leail tor -Q months and Sentence 4o a resttuticm ot ^J-5 million, vvinfch T had to pay aob tp-r 5em<rcs pe^tormed j not just one ? *fbr Medtcar-e Semces Z piohded tor Over 3 yeavs> (_ 100%, psiyhaeU-}- feat tor iiends Zand 2.^ X should be^rzxnied a Cteiditcrde> of- appenli bility as Z i/voald have chosen tocjoto tndI as T wae denied a constitutions I rioht C Stb Amend ment a nd Ahnendnnent) to ettectin^ counsel. 14) Since Oecember Z023 1 still have not vecewod my discovery and cannot access W as Wfe Icy the United -States, bistndr Couvtdx the Cental OdMct of California Case > whbh is a Violat&n of my consttutiowrl riahfs Fitth /b^nendmoTt.