Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Xena Ames
IFP petition
Questions presented
-
) Whether the issuance of a writ of mandamus is the proper procedure to correct a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court, due to erroneous issues with ineffective counsel.
-
) Whether the lower courts erred in fact and law and abused their discretion. Parties to the proceeding Xena Ames was an employee of The Department of Veteran Affairs, FedEx and Commonwealth who rightfully used the EEOC equal employment opportunity commission and even in doing so was fired from her job while protected by the EEOC. Respondents: FedEx: Employees Barbara Hutchinson, David Murtland, Chris Pipes, Josh ( Managers) Commonwealth Hotels: Kim (HR), Sarah (Manager) and Linda (employee) Lodge Members: Jornette Holmes, Jocelyn Miller, Tamika Dickerson, Rodney Jackson and Xenisha Hawkins, Mildred Craig. (Family & Lodge members). Attorney Office: Paul Cummings & Ana Sifuentes (Attorney & Assistant) The Department of Veteran Affairs: Non-VA CARE Mitchell Metcalf (Lodge member & employee). The United States Military Unit: Cpt. Vargas and Sgt. Ferguson
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Xena Ames
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 20 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 02 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
- Jul 22 2025Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 12, 2025)