In Re Dennis Griffith

t/) Does cl iHValiJ usurer ot Counsel hearing and no access to fke. Courts, don^ aJ+k etker ~ pcetrid violations o'? Conrhtutiond rigkts 5cJ Compulsory prote-SSy C/glvt to an cfaoff&y owd tkfirCi^kt to organiie. cuid present cv defense /Make- fke ewhre trfal {anda/jienfdly unfair? petitioners plea? 4or access to fke mmi/nam took tkd Ou indict fro 5e (Je'fzncii^t fteeds Q,nd kas <J/ OdMstituf/onai rigkt defied access to le$d /nder/al 1 l^a\ ^advi$De/ofjani.zatioAy1l«^iB»WHWtp»l'fcee pjwne access and access to the- Court >■ ^LQo.es_a_iMjs£.acdA_^e-ofustice occur culyen a,jnd^&ct’ ffoSe^ol^enda^IS deniedary , .Opportunity to pre-pare dricl organ R-e Ai6 defense} deny/n^-fl/m I^S $tk,6tk and /4fk OiiMenc/meMt tfgkfe to due ^ro€&$s o'f tke Icmv, e^aj jjfoted/on o^jh& lau/aAcl cl■pour trial? Coad aypiWec/_Djfed^Ay^ea/j Aferney //ie^fedju& for /yiorin^ oil tke- issues preSen/tec/ abo^jdenying petd/oner "Adrprou-^ Qnd tkej^^^jOppe/^Andy to u/4i <sa^kStote_procedure?_l0,..o.bfeviw.cu/juc//ad)aii an Ae, werih_of tf$ claim? and cvtiec/ adkontie? ?