Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Doina Rosu Almazon v. Town of Oyster Bay, New York

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-2789 · judgment April 28, 2025


Certiorari denied · October 6, 2025

Question presented

Did the Town of Oyster Bay’s action in demolishing the plaintiff’s nearly completed, rebuilt home violate the due process guarantee under the United States Constitution’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? Parties to the Proceedings Petitioner Doina Rosu Almazon was the plaintiff in the United States District Court and the appellant in the United States Court of Appeals. Respondent Town of Oyster Bay was the defendant in the United States District Court and the appellee in the United States Court of Appeals. Statement of Related Proceedings As noted in the District Court’s decision (Appx B), related cases include, • On April 16, 2021, Oyster Bay filed a lawsuit against Ms. Almazon in Nassau County Supreme Court (“First State Action”); • On May 24, 2022, Ms. Almazon filed an action in federal court, Doina Rosu v. The Town of Oyster Bay, et al., No. 22-cv-3073 (E.D.N.Y) (“First Federal Action”), asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for “violating [her] due process rights [and] civil

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Michael James Confusione
Hegge & Confusione

For respondent
Andrew K. Preston
Bee Ready Law Group, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 06 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 28 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  3. Aug 15 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Town of Oyster Bay, New York to respond filed.
  4. Jul 21 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)