Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Doina Rosu Almazon v. Town of Oyster Bay, New York
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-2789 · judgment April 28, 2025
Question presented
Did the Town of Oyster Bay’s action in demolishing the plaintiff’s nearly completed, rebuilt home violate the due process guarantee under the United States Constitution’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments? Parties to the Proceedings Petitioner Doina Rosu Almazon was the plaintiff in the United States District Court and the appellant in the United States Court of Appeals. Respondent Town of Oyster Bay was the defendant in the United States District Court and the appellee in the United States Court of Appeals. Statement of Related Proceedings As noted in the District Court’s decision (Appx B), related cases include, • On April 16, 2021, Oyster Bay filed a lawsuit against Ms. Almazon in Nassau County Supreme Court (“First State Action”); • On May 24, 2022, Ms. Almazon filed an action in federal court, Doina Rosu v. The Town of Oyster Bay, et al., No. 22-cv-3073 (E.D.N.Y) (“First Federal Action”), asserting claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for “violating [her] due process rights [and] civil
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael James Confusione
Hegge & Confusione
For respondent
Andrew K. Preston
Bee Ready Law Group, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 15 2025Waiver of right of respondent Town of Oyster Bay, New York to respond filed.
- Jul 21 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)