Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mao Hin v. California
IFP petition · Supreme Court of California, No. S141519 · judgment February 3, 2025
Question presented
Whether California’s capital-sentencing scheme violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments because it fails to require the jury to find unanimously and beyond a reasonable doubt the facts necessary to impose a sentence of death rather than life without possibility of parole?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Donald Robert Tickle
Attorney at Law
For respondent
Jeffrey Alan White
California Department of Justice
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 6, 2025 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Sep 11 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 25 2025Brief of respondent California in opposition filed.
- Jul 15 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)