Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Otoniel Cornejo v. California
IFP petition · Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, No. C098631 · judgment January 27, 2025
Certiorari denied · October 6, 2025
Question presented
Does the record lack substantial evidence to support an inference that petitioner had the present ability to apply force with a firearm when that firearm was loaded with a single bullet that had already misfired?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Otoniel Cornejo
For respondent
Darren Kyle Indermill
California Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 28 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 20 2025Waiver of right of respondent California to respond filed.
- Jul 13 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2025)