Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Isaias Lopez Nunez v. Martin Gamboa, Warden
IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-2562 · judgment March 21, 2025
Question presented
-
Whether the California courts’ and Ninth Circuit’s rejection of an Ex Post Facto Clause claim—where a more punitive law was applied at sentencing, eliminating a prior statutory eligibility for probation—violates clearly established U.S. Supreme Court precedent.
-
Whether procedural default based on California’s contemporaneous objection rule applies to federal ex post facto claims, particularly where trial counsel’s failure to object constituted ineffective assistance of counsel, forfeiting any opportunity to request probation on three lewd act convictions. - ii -
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Benjamin Ramos
Law Office of Benjamin Ramos
For respondent
Christopher P. Beesley
Office of the Atty. Gen. of the State of CA
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 07 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 05 2025Waiver of right of respondent Martin Gamboa to respond filed.
- May 20 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 25, 2025)