Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jose Antonio Cossio, Jr. v. Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, et al.

IFP petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 23-3100 · judgment February 27, 2025


Certiorari denied · October 6, 2025

Question presented

WHETHER MANDAMUS SHOULD ISSUE AGAINST THE AIR FORCE WHEN ITS COURT DISREGARDED THE SUPREME COURT'S DECISION IN VAN BUREN 593 U.S. 374 (2021) IN VIOLATION OF THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE AND ARTICLE III OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION? PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING All parties to the proceeding in the court whose judgment is sought to be reviewed are listed in the caption. Respondents are: JOSE ANTONIO COSSIO Jr. THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force RELATED CASES In re Cossio, Misc. Dkt. No. 2021-04, 2021 WL 6105497, at *5 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. Dec. 20, 2021) Cossio v. Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, No. l:22-cv-00110 (N.D. Ill.) (district court judgment entered September 29,2023) Cossio v. Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals, No. 23-3100 (7th Cir. 2025) (court of appeals judgment entered February 27, 2025)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jose Antonio Cossio Jr.

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 06 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Aug 21 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  3. Jul 29 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
  4. May 27 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 18, 2025)