George Hamilton v. California Department of General Services, Government Claims Program, et al.

lohe-HeK “+h£z wX op 0>Newi ^sepvdce^ GoVgh^MM6kH- cLAimS f3^o^li?AM/ FAi LuiQe Xo process] zvivd PRov?de pcdXceJ op F^d C L A t HI Qs) z i kj ComPLi am Ce Ot? i ~Ho 4d>e — &%L ^FoRbJi'^ POVGt^iQh^^KH- CLAIMS ACXz c COct/fe^ %lO s&^/VioLat^ ~Hn£> 14Tln AMeNcL due tftoc&ss C LAUS A CCoRd i N p Xo dh 6> P® f M C t P Lg>S e HU Ki - Ci"irJ ~ LOPAM V>ZiHM^MAN 6/QU3h COjJOZ S.C+. //4-S CllZZ) ? ) BAS<£cl oi\j such .sSf^Vte'- FAiLuRCS diV&&p pe4?4-i'0KJ^e op MUL+rpLe pe^oNAL ppop&^py im4^rc^s~Ls ppouNideci ?m caL?f. c?i/iL Code> & *753/does dhe> s4-aX^> hAUC? a d^XY Xu APFOPd 4hez due^ Process PpoceduPAL SAFeFUA^d'S M Awd AXed jX— MAXH?eUJ-S VS BL“ d^?dGez42X U .So 3/?( P ) uwdfcK fo^UM^ cLa.mS Ac+^oe^ 4he i>efX. oF Fe nj&r a L ^e> vi ces go m mclX ' CLAIMS PROGRAM/hAl/e A duXY Xo PROCESS