Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
William Menter v. New Jersey
IFP petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-0297-22 · judgment October 23, 2024
Question presented
.................................................................... i Parties to the Proceeding.........................................................................................................ii Corporate Disclosure................................................................................................................ ii Related Cases.............................................................................................................................ii Table of Appendix..................................................................................................................... iii Table of Authorities.................................................................................................................. iv Opinions and Orders Below..................................................................................................... 1 Jurisdictions............................................................................................................................... 2 Constitutional and Statutory Provisions Involved............................................................ 2 Statement of the Case...............................................................................................................3 Background..................................................................................................................... 3 Procedural History..................................................................................................... 3 Reasons for Granting the Writ............................................................................................... 7 A) Whether the state court's decision on Appellant’s Illegal Sentence claims contrary to State v. Yarbough, 100 N.J. 627 (1985) whether the Appellant’s rights to due process were violated by this decision?.................................................................................7 B) Whether the state court’s decision was contrary to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) and United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984) and whether the Appellant’s rights were violated by the decisions?.............................................................................. 13 Conclusion................................................................................................................................ 17
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William Menter
For respondent
Patrick F. Galdieri II
Hudson County Prosecutor's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 06 2025Petition DENIED.
- Aug 21 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
- Aug 08 2025Waiver of right of respondent New Jersey to respond filed.
- Apr 10 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 11, 2025)