Arnold Anderson v. Terry Royal, Warden, et al.

\T A COb*5T b4 AC MIOVATiOkJ vcT COHxfuA WJ CT A (^sTTiT^ \j io v'’ \ v^5 TO Tfr£ TSb^? Tttg pee^LVTOli. TO HM1C tHfe ^-cs fT CD^'SV-n-U'aO^^CxilOVAViGK) toq> tit sovft^T*>Jfc m»tit n 11!- AvTfr ‘SAY ^GOY-eON'H ^MSsr^AVoe ueQegE vM <W™» I A-' «A tY^M-OAYT -r-?x oV-0ss C AAm i jJ t=> Th"' Tf \ o > . A ^TiWTOuM. MWIATIOW TO fWta® AT?-«tiJ ZTTAXAT F(L0<t xrose M6 WTEoT fOAKirtfc A tetoM) O« Lew-Tie fflWtnes PtOt'* THS TJM Pool WITHOUT CCIA»AUfo A fte«TS>’ ATb IT A CONSTITUTE AL WlAT10,0 FoR THe PWS^OTOILTO T% lT A “YFePEBT -^oW OF Mi^™s TMT to no< WTA ?9.osecuT5 a ^T^xni TWt police" (2je po?3 ( ttoteM- wv.-“ to vote we TO T^ATCN SOtcfbE \tsvTA CfiVi^TOl lO^v XfAKVCAV lvrt\AT\0iJ T“O XNA'VC'A A^I?(^WW6 ' £AC s v k ^s-Vv-WVVO^AC MVOkAVVO^ l»UW H'O SHOOCMLS Wt-lNt «>T CJOSVM4 NTS . V- Al \nfl\AT\0)J 75VS)G>Er TO ^AY ^A(^>AY —<- .-t~ COiAySV <V3V V0V4AO \Jw\A ' vOXJ Y 1MTHtolHITW PMS®COTO(LS VWOB-sTVoATOIt IS P^U^lUAC TtYmXJOtS) fffflTVJ? TUf’T TWAT VNtONfc? x ,_ r ,-rIO3j aC \o\Av io kj To & ^H-e pCo^ecUToP- \ o I)xs \y a oor^ otu^e A ro^ TT\A< n0T fet'Nfo IN TTahnoc. to P«ojs a« vN^ias to Ttte AUecffies CT YC'cVA YX\ ibsi ATY \ xjjicT^^. OOA \O SAY AQo-e 1 vo> tA TO Av$Y CT A V A \T A-p-\AC ; P^oCJB vxre^