Stephen T. Aguiar v. United States

DESPITE THE RECORD SHOWING THAT PETITIONER IS FACTUALLY INNOCENT OF DISTRIBUTING MORPHINE, DID THE SECOND CIRCUIT ERR IN AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S FINAL JUDGMENT TO DENY PETITIONER'S CLAIM?

DID THE SECOND CIRCUIT ERR BY DISCOUNTING PETITIONER'S NEW EVIDENCE OF HIS 2010-DIAGN0SED TRAUMATIC INJURY CALLING INTO QUESTION HIS 1994-1995 MENTAL COMPETENCY WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING AND INSTEAD AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S RULING TO DENY PETITIONER'S CLAIMS BASED ON AN OVERLAPPING 18 YEAR DELAY? ~

DID THE SECOND CIRCUIT ERR BY AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S ADVERSE JUDGMENT BASED ON PETITIONER'S 18 YEAR DELAY IN FILING HIS CORAM NOBIS CLAIMS WITHOUT CONSIDERING THAT HIS CHALLENGE TO HIS 1995 DISTRIBUTION OF MORPHINE CONVICTION COULD NOT HAVE ACCRUED UNTIL -2014 AT WHICH TIME PETITIONER'S DRUG CONSPIRACY CASE CONVICTION BECAME FINAL AND ONLY THEN COULD PETITIONER SATISFY ALL THREE REQUISITE PRONGS OF THE CORAM NOBIS REMEDY?

DID THE SECOND CIRCUIT ERR BY FAILING-TO FULLY ADDRESS OR RESOLVE EACH OF PETITIONER'S RAISED CLAIMS BELOW?

DESPITE PETITIONER HAVING EXPUNGED.HIS PRIOR STATE CONVICTIONS DRASTICALLY REDUCING HIS 1995-IMPOSED MANDATORY GUIDELINES SENTENCE, DID THE SECOND CIRCUIT ERR BY FAILING?TO CONSIDER WHETHER PETITIONER'S SENTENCE SHOULD BE REDUCED?