Christopher A. Rogalski v. Pennsylvania Department of Education, et al.

Do educators have the basic First Amendment right to communicate with their students free of a presumption that by doing so they are engaged in “grooming” or “targeting” them for an “inappropriate relationship”? (Suggested answer is in the affirmative.)

Does Due Process of Law require that disciplinary action against educators for exercising First Amendment rights be based upon violation of promulgated rules of conduct and ethics? (Suggested answer is in the affirmative.)

Does Due Process of Law require the right to confront and cross examine an accuser prior to a determination imposing administrative “discipline” based upon a determination that a person is a “danger” to others, or restated, is the lower court's ruling that an affidavit for an arrest warrant creates an unrebuttable presumption of its truth an impermissible interpre­ tation of the constitutional burden of proof for administrative “discipline” ? (Suggested answer is in the affirmative.)

Does the Due Process of Law right to justice without de­ nial or delay require taking judicial or administrative notice of a court transcript of testimony contrary to allegations made by totem pole hearsay? (Suggested answer is in the affirmative.)

Does Appellant's Fourteenth Amendment right to liberty and Due Process right to a fair trial supersede the Common­ wealth's interest in involuntarily determining his “eligibility” to apply for a renewed teaching license so it could publish false allegations against him online to poison potential jurors in the criminal case?