Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Julien P. Champagne v. Douglas A. Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2023-1047 · judgment December 6, 2024


Certiorari denied · January 26, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

In order to receive disability benefits, a veteran must file a “specific claim in the form prescribed by the Secretary” of Veterans Affairs. 38 U.S.C. § 5101(a). Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) regulations govern the submission of claims for disability benefits, including the two most important types of benefits: claims for compensation for service-connected disability and claims for pension for disabled veterans. Veterans eligible for both types of benefits may receive only one, and the two options can result in vastly different awards. But veterans—especially veterans poor and disabled enough to qualify for both—often cannot independently assess their eligibility for, and amount of entitlement under, each benefit. Given that reality, VA regulation 38 C.F.R. § 3.151(a) reassures veterans that regardless of how they complete their application for benefits, “[t]he greater benefit will be awarded,” because a “claim by a veteran for compensation may be considered to be a claim for pension; and a claim by a veteran for pension may be considered to be a claim for compensation.” The question presented is: Whether the VA must process a disability claim as a claim for both pension and compensation if the veteran has a possible entitlement to both benefits and award “the greater” benefit available as provided by 38 C.F.R. § 3.151(a), or whether the VA instead has discretion to disregard a potentially meritorious compensation claim and therefore afford the lesser benefit available to the veteran?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jaime Ann Santos
Goodwin Procter LLP

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Amicus briefs
2 cert-stage

Linked docket
25A149

Proceedings

  1. Jan 26 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jan 07 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/23/2026.
  3. Jan 06 2026
    Reply of petitioner Julien P. Champagne filed. (Distributed)
  4. Dec 19 2025
    Brief of respondent Collins, Sec. of VA in opposition filed.
  5. Nov 19 2025
    Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed.
  6. Nov 19 2025
    Brief amicus curiae of Military-Veterans Advocacy, Inc. filed.
  7. Nov 18 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 19, 2025.
  8. Nov 17 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 19, 2025 to December 19, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Oct 16 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2025)
  10. Sep 29 2025
    Application (25A149) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 16, 2025.
  11. Sep 22 2025
    Application (25A149) to extend further the time from October 2, 2025 to October 16, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.
  12. Aug 06 2025
    Application (25A149) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until October 2, 2025.
  13. Aug 01 2025
    Application (25A149) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 1, 2025 to October 2, 2025, submitted to The Chief Justice.