Timothy Ryan Gove v. Sargento Foods, Inc.

QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW

1. If management of a company orders and directs activities outside of its facilities listed under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(c) or framing-up an/or under 18U.S.C. § 242 a person who has been discriminated on its corporate grounds, should the allegations be allowed to be investigated as evidence under 29 CFR § 18.401 in an employment litigation case?

2. In separate appeals; 21-1235 Doc 9 & 24-2691 Doc 3, the U.S Court of Appeals for the Seventh District; were presented similar evidence of working in a hostile environment for an employment claim, and bad faith practices by the Defendant. One decision vacated the dismissal, while the other decision affirmed it. How can this be?

3. Inthe first appeal 21-1235 Doc 9; the Plaintiffs made allegations, that the Defendant was involving third parties to commit acts of enticement/seduction by female personnel inside/outside of the company’s employment | . boundaries? With the dismissal vacated, did , District Court need instructions from the Appellate Court on how it should proceed? A. In an employment litigation case; after the complaint is filed; the Plaintiff later discovers the Defendant has been perpetrating acts against the Plaintiff to remove him from employment. Regardless if these were criminal acts or not, can the new evidence be investigated.

4. Ifa person was involved in committing bad faith acts against the Plaintiff for that company, should they be mandated by the court to be interrogated in a case against the Defendant?