Daniel Jon Fouliard v. Wisconsin

It is ideal for the Supreme Court to review Fouliard v. Wisconsin to clarify the constitutionality of “bail jumping” because non-violent, non-argumentative, nonthreatening, information seeking forms of free speech not directed, “directly, nor indirectly’, at anyone on the prohibited contact list, were prosecuted as the crimes of felony bail jumping, harassment, and stalking! Did Prosecutors violate This Petitioner’s Constitutional Rights, via the overbreadth & vagueness doctrines, by prosecuting protected forms of non-violent free speech as felonies?

If the average person knows it is impossible to falsely imprison anyone in this Master Bedroom after looking at the floor plan and reading the DA’s write up: is it a violation of This Petitioner’s 5th and 14th amendment rights to continue to label This Petitioner a “Domestically Violent Abuser & Stalker” via a miscarriage of justice? And does This Petitioner qualify for any exceptional discretionary legal remedies?

This Court may also find it ideal to accept this case to clarify how the Clergy Privilege is “sedulously foster” in America to lower Courts