Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Eran Rubinstein, et ux. v. Bank of America, N.A., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 23-2410 · judgment April 30, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
The first question presented is whether civil RICO is subject to a “separate accrual” rule whereby a new claim accrues, triggering a new four-year limitations period, each time plaintiff discovers, or should have discovered, a new injury.
-
W hether civil RICO claims only accrue when plaintiffs should have discovered their injuries, not the defendants’ wrongful conduct, and irrespective of whether the particular plaintiff actually investigated “storm warnings.”
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Eran Rubinstein
Law Office of Eran Rubinstein
For respondent
Keith Levenberg
Goodwin Procter LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 22 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Oct 14 2025Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon, National Residential Assets Corp., J. Mark Swintek, Terri Stallings, Kim B. Martinez, and Chad M. Anderson to respond filed.
- Sep 30 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)