Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jake Ellis Daughtry, et al. v. Silver Fern Chemical, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24-40400 · judgment May 12, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether Bridge v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co. permits a fraud claim based on misrepresentations to a third-party government agency that cause injury to the plaintiff, or whether the Fifth Circuit may impose a categorical first-party reliance requirement.
-
Whether Heck v. Humphrey bars state-law fraud claims against private parties who fabricated evidence, where success would establish only their misconduct and not necessarily imply the invalidity of any conviction. Resolving both questions is essential to ensure that private actors cannot exploit government agencies as instruments of fraud while evading accountability.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Larry Watts
Watts & Associates
For respondent
John Andrew Hutton
Gordon Rees Scully Masukhani LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 08 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Oct 06 2025Waiver of right of respondent Gilda Franco to respond filed.
- Oct 06 2025Waiver of right of respondent Silver Fern Chemical, Inc to respond filed.
- Sep 10 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2025)