Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
J. P. v. J. N.
Paid petition · Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, No. A-2616-21 · judgment January 17, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Did corruption within the NJ judiciary violate the petitioner-plaintiff’s constitutional rights?
-
Why was the Appellate team switched to all individuals who were Alma Maters with NJ Superior Court Judge Robert H. Gardner (his decision was on appeal), from the Part D team, consisting of all former victims’ advocates, with no common thread to Judge Gardner (Greta Gooden-Brown, Stephanie Ann Mitterhoff and Michael J. Haas) to serve the interest of Judge Gardner, over that of the petitioner plaintiff?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
J. P.
For respondent
John Edmund Hogan
Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer P.A.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Nov 17 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 29 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/14/2025.
- Oct 27 2025Waiver of right of respondent J. N. to respond filed.
- Oct 09 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 27, 2025)