Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Carina Conerly, et al. v. Sharif R. Tarpin, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 23-15297 · judgment September 23, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
QUESTIONS
-
WHETHER, Petitioner should consider a State Judges laws Constitutionally Powerful, when the Justice System Court Judges ban, by court order, Petitioner and her Parents from videotaping wrongful acts in a public place?
-
WHETHER, Judges are acting Constitutionally, when they require Petitioner to perform under the laws, however, they excuse Respondent’s acts because Respondent is in Pro Se, and so are Petitioner Pro Se?
-
WHETHER, a judge should disallow authentic evidence to come in to Court, because it is on USB Sticks, taken from several Car Cameras, that clearly captures the two chasing and Petitioners and dangerously cutting in front of Petitioners’ moving automobile, Respondents using their two automobile to cause a chase of Petitioners’ automobile, sandwiching Petitioners in, until
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Carina Conerly
For respondent
Matthew David Ruyak
City of Sacramento, City Attorney's Office
Proceedings
- Nov 10 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 15 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/7/2025.
- Oct 10 2025Reply of petitioners Carina Conerly, et al. filed. (Distributed)
- Sep 26 2025Brief of respondents Sacramento Police Department, et al. in opposition filed.
- Feb 20 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 26, 2025)
- Dec 31 2024Application (24A645) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 20, 2025.
- Dec 22 2024Application (24A645) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 22, 2024 to February 20, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.