Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gravity Funding, LLC and Gravity Capital, LLC v. United States, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-20475, 24-20039 · judgment May 16, 2025
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n), third-party petitioners asserting an interest in property that has been forfeited to the federal government must file a verified petition within thirty days of being notified by the government identifying the nature and extent of their interest in the property. Gravity Capital, LLC (“Gravity Capital” or “Gravity”) filed a timely, sworn petition, attaching a verified deed of trust evidencing its security interest in forfeited real property, but the petition included mistaken references to Gravity Funding, LLC (“Gravity Funding”), an affiliated entity. The district court held that Gravity’s petition was submitted by Gravity Funding and Gravity Capital could not cure this technical pleading defect outside of Section 853(n)’s 30-day filing deadline, which had expired. The Fifth Circuit affirmed, widening an established circuit split on the core pleading and amendment rules that apply in forfeiture proceedings. The Fifth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits hold that Section 853(n)’s thirtyday filing deadline bars any amendments after the filing deadline. The Second and Seventh Circuits, on the other hand, reject this construction as violating the remedial purposes Congress expressly intended, holding that pleading amendments should be allowed for good cause. The question presented is whether Section 853(n) permits a third-party claimant to amend its petition to cure technical pleading defects after the expiration of the 30-day filing period, or whether the statute strictly prohibits all amendments requested thereafter, no matter the circumstances.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey W. Hellberg Jr.
Wick Phillip s Gould & Martin, LL P
For respondent
Kenneth Michael Krock
Rapp & Krock, PC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 20 2025Petition DENIED.
- Oct 01 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/17/2025.
- Sep 17 2025Brief of E. Alan Tiras and E. Alan Tiras, P.C. in opposition not accepted for filing. (To be corrected - September 18, 2025)
- Sep 17 2025Brief of respondents E. Alan Tiras, et al. in opposition filed. (Corrected)
- Aug 21 2025Waiver of right of respondent Federal Party to respond filed.
- Aug 13 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2025)