In Re Andy Desty

Has the authority and ruling of the Supreme Court case between Holmberg v. Holmberg, 588 N.W.2d 720 (Minn. 1999), to stop Corporation’s child support slavery, process, agreements, program, payment obligations like Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services’ Administrative Hearings Child Support hearing process in their unconstitutional delegation of judicial power to an Executive Branch agency, been extinguished pursuant to Article 1 Delegation of Legislative Power § 1, because of a U.S. District Court’s Judgment or Opinion and Order?

Has the authority and ruling in the United States Supreme Court case between NODD v. Shalala, No. 95’1741, overruled by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Atlanta Division’s judgment or decision interpretating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, permit Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services’ use of deprivation of rights and property without due process of law decisions?

Does Georgia Department of Human Services/Child Support Services possess a federal due process right over all natural men and women on this land to gain or acquire validation of abusive power from courts to detriment the souls of the American people by violating Separation of Powers Doctrine to build security in- terest pursuant to U.S. Const. Amend. V and XIV?