Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Steve Snyder, et al. v. Village of Luckey, Ohio
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 24-3530 · judgment November 24, 2025
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below, and a Sixth Circuit decision below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Questions presented
In addition to the reversal of the November 24, 2025, Judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, the questions for which Petitioners seek certiorari are as follows:
-
Whether this Court’s Opinion in Knick, supra, permits a federal cause of action against a municipal entity for an uncompensated physical taking when the municipal entity has materially impaired the value and precluded the alienability of the Petitioners’ property.
-
Whether the actions of the Village in singling out the Petitioners’ property and engaging in concerted actions to prevent its sale at auction are sufficient to state a claim for violation of Petitioners’ rights to due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marvin Anthony Robon
Barkan & Robon Ltd.
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Due Process (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 5, 2026 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 05 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jul 22 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Apr 02 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 9, 2026)