Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jonathan Granado v. Juanita Ramirez, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Estevan Ramirez

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 24-10755 · judgment December 10, 2025


15%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
95% interval 10%–20%
Rule 10: dissent below, circuit split argued
At the Nov 6 conference: granted 5.1% · GVR 3.1% · relisted 37% · denied 55%
Granted ever, conference-stage estimate: 12%

About 3.5× the 4.1% base rate. The model weights this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a petition citing three to ten dissents.

Questions presented

  1. Whether Officer Jonathan Granado’s use of deadly force on September 3, 2021 violated the Fourth Amendment when, after a high-speed chase, Estevan Ramirez emerged from the vehicle with gun in hand, refused an order to “get on the ground,” physically resisted an officer’s attempt to arrest, and attempted to escape towards the darkness of a residential neighborhood with gun still in hand. a. Did the panel correctly set forth the elements of an excessive force claim? b. Did the panel invert the qualified immunity analysis by shifting the burden from Ramirez to Officer Granado? c. Does the panel’s approach to qualified immunity force officers “to play roulette with their own existence”?

  2. Whether any court other than the Supreme Court can clearly establish the law for purposes of qualified immunity, and if so, whether the panel majority correctly identified the clearly established law applicable to this case.

  3. Whether this Court should resolve the controversies regarding qualified immunity by examining the source of qualified immunity as of 1791, when the Bill of Rights was ratified, and/or, by applying statutory stare decisis to Pierson v. Ray and its progeny.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Thomas Phillip Brandt
Thompson, Coe, Cousins & Irons, LL P

For respondent
Blerim Elmazi
The Law Offices of Blerim Elmazi, PLLC

Case

Subject area
Civil Rights (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Oct 07 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/6/2026.
  2. Sep 28 2026
    Electronic record received from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
  3. Sep 23 2026
    The record for the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is available on PACER.
  4. Sep 22 2026
    Record Requested.
  5. Sep 17 2026
    Docket entry of 9/17/2026 requesting a response to the petition entered in error and entry removed from docket. (9/22/2026)
  6. Sep 02 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
  7. Aug 17 2026
    Brief of respondent Juanita Ramirez in opposition filed.
  8. Jul 29 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 17, 2026.
  9. Jul 28 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 31, 2026 to August 17, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  10. Jun 30 2026
    Brief amici curiae of Texas Association of Counties, et al. filed.
  11. Jun 22 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 31, 2026.
  12. Jun 18 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  13. May 21 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 1, 2026)