Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Joan Farr
Paid petition
(petition-stage, structural)
Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Inconjunction with Joan Farr’s prior writ of certiorari filed in this matter, was Actor Keanu Reeves denied the same civil rights by the defendants and should Farr be allowed to act as his “next friend” in filing this writ of mandamus under the doctrine of special circumstances?
-
Ifthis case is remanded back for trial, should Actor Keanu Reeves be added as a plaintiff as well as additional parties added as defendants to ensure due process and prevent continuing manifest injustice? *Please note: All of Farr’s questions, responses, laws, case law, documents, exhibits, arguments, orders and judgments in her prior writ of certiorari apply to this writ of mandamus as well concerning Actor Keanu Reeves (except for those pertaining to Question #3). She is not listing them to avoid redundancy and a waste of resources, and printing costs are a financial hardship. In addition, she adopts and incorporates all of her statements, documents and exhibits included in her FTCA claim filed on October 17, 2025 against the federal agencies named herein which was denied on November 24, 2025 (Appendix E, Exhibit A). She is within the six-month time frame for filing this case.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joan Farr
For respondent
Michael C. Kirkham
Sanders Warren & Russell
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jul 02 2026Waiver of right of respondents Scott Sims, Ziffren Brittenham LLP to respond filed.
- Jul 01 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2026.
- Jun 22 2026Waiver of right of respondents Alexandra Grant and grantLove LLC to respond filed.
- Jun 22 2026Waiver of right of respondent WME IMG, LLC to respond filed.
- Jun 02 2026Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- May 20 2026Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due June 26, 2026)