Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Vikram Valame v. Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-369 · judgment November 4, 2025


Certiorari denied · June 22, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

The Military Selective Service Act requires men, and only men, to register for the draft. 50 U.S.C. § 3802(a). Failure to register carries substantial penalties. In Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (1981), this Court upheld the act because “[w]omen as a group, * * * unlike men as a group, are not eligible for combat.” Id. at 76. Therefore, men and women were “simply not similarly situated for purposes of a draft or registration for a draft.” Id. at 78. From 2013 to 2015, building on congressional action, the Department of Defense completely eliminated restrictions on women in combat. The first question presented is:

  1. Whether, in light of Congress and the Department of Defense having lifted the ban on women in combat, the male-only draft violates the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause. Article V states that constitutional amendments “shall be valid” when proposed by Congress and ratified by three-fourths of the states. U.S. CONST. Art. V. In 1972, Congress proposed the Equal Rights Amendment. In 2020, Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it. The court below held Virginia’s ratification ineffective because Congress purported to impose (and later amend) a deadline on the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment outside the text of that Amendment. The second question presented is:

  2. Whether Congress may impose mutable conditions on the ratification of a constitutional amendment not found in either the text of the Constitution or the text of the proposed amendment.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Vikram Valame

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A835

Proceedings

  1. Jun 22 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 02 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2026.
  3. May 28 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
  4. Mar 09 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2026)
  5. Jan 21 2026
    Application (25A835) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 9, 2026.
  6. Jan 15 2026
    Application (25A835) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 2, 2026 to March 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.