Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Karina Sigalovskaya v. Abigail Braden, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as a Special Agent for the Department of Homeland Security

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 23-7625 · judgment August 27, 2025


1%
estimated cert probability
(petition-stage, structural)
GVR risk 5%

Well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the Court recognized an implied cause of action under the Fourth Amendment against Federal Bureau of Narcotics agents who entered the plaintiff’s home without a warrant, conducted a search, and then arrested him—in front of his children— without probable cause. In this case, federal law enforcement officers entered Petitioner’s home without a warrant, searched the premises, and separated her from her children. While inside the house, one of the officers falsely claimed that Petitioner had just confessed to a crime and used that as a pretext for taking her into custody. As in Bivens itself, no probable cause existed for the arrest. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether Bivens provides a remedy when federal officers enter a home without a warrant, fabricate evidence during the search, and use that evidence to arrest the resident without probable cause.

  2. Whether the availability of an alternative remedy independently forecloses a Bivens claim that does not otherwise meaningfully differ from Bivens itself.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Joseph Aaron Pace
J. Pace Law PLLC

For respondent
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A929

Proceedings

  1. Aug 26 2026
    Brief of Federal Respondent in opposition filed.
  2. Aug 04 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 26, 2026.
  3. Jul 31 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 17, 2026 to August 26, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  4. Jul 13 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 17, 2026.
  5. Jul 10 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 17, 2026 to August 17, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Jun 17 2026
    Response Requested. (Due July 17, 2026)
  7. Jun 09 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
  8. Jun 03 2026
    Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
  9. May 01 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2026)
  10. Feb 20 2026
    Application (25A929) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until May 1, 2026.
  11. Feb 17 2026
    Application (25A929) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 2, 2026 to May 1, 2026, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.