Salissou Karim-Seidou v. CMA CGM (America) LLC, et al.

Whether, when denying a Litigant leave to amend a complaint a district court must provide a reason for that denial as held by the third, Seven, Ninth, Eleventh and D.C. Circuits or whether a district court need not provide justifying reasons when denying a pro se Litigant leave to amend the complaint if that reason is apparent from an analysis of the record (as held by the First, Fourth, and Tenth Circuits) Is this a violation of due process?

Whether the Lower Court abused its discretion when departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by dismissing the complaint “with prejudice” denying leave to amend under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) where the deficiencies were curable and no prejudice to the opposing party was shown? Rule 15(a)(2) “Leave shall be freely given”?

Whether the Third Circuit “overlooked or departed” from its own accepted and usual Judicial proceedings Rules by affirming the district court denial. Whether a complaint is subject to dismissal under Rule 12 where the dismissal order fails to allow plaintiffs, (Pro Se) any chance to amend the dismissed claims to conform to pleading standards?