William H. Ferrell v. Department of the Interior

Is the MSPB “Adjudication” process as mandated to federal civilian employees who petition MSPB appeals and authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1295 (9) - Judiciary and Judicial Procedure which only authorizes 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1) and (d) while omitting 5 U.S. C. § 77083 (c) systemically and illegally limiting, inhibiting, denying, restraining, abridging and\or depriving federal employees of their rights, privileges, immunities, assurances and\or protections of established laws and precedents including their US Constitutional rights, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments in departure from Marchant v. Pa. R.R., 153 U.S. 380, 386 (1894) where a litigant had the benefit of a full and fair trial or depriving federal civilian employees subjected to the MSPB process of; life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; or otherwise denying to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws as established in Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516, 537 (1884), Hagar v. Reclamation Dist., 111 U.S. 701, 708 (1884) by extinguishing and denying the Federal Circuit’s the ability to review MSPB cases de novo ?