Wade Ryan Reeves v. Alisha May Reeves

Did the Supreme Court of Oklahoma violate the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment by dismissing Mr. Reeves’s appeal even though the appellate record had not been filed or completed, and despite receiving notice that sixteen designated items were missing, thereby denying him meaningful review of structural constitutional claims?

Did Oklahoma violate the Full Faith and Credit Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment by enforcing only portions of a California judgment, disregarding the governing-law clause and contractual terms contained in the Marital Settlement Agreement, and issuing Oklahoma orders inconsistent with the judgment as written?

Did Oklahoma violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s requirement of a lawfully constituted tribunal by exercising judicial power without determining its jurisdiction on the record, denying Mr. Reeves any opportunity to present evidence or testimony, and enforcing a foreign judgment through a tribunal that never established lawful authority to act?