Julie A. Weiman v. Alyn D. Wine, et al.

Fraud Exception / Access to Courts. Whether the Tenth Circuit’s categorical rejection of an “extrinsic fraud” exception to the Rooker Feldman doctrine in direct conflict with the Ninth and Sixth Circuits unconstitutionally immunizes state-court judgments procured through the willful fabrication of evidence and attorney fraud, thereby depriving victims ofjudicial corruption of their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and meaningful access to the courts.

State Action and Unreasonable Seizure. Whether a private litigant’s calculated corruption of state judicial proceedings through the fabrication of evidence and suppression of exculpatory proof, perpetrated with the active complicity of legal counsel to induce judicial error and seize a primary residence, constitutes “state action” under the “joint participation” doctrine of Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co., 457 U.S. 922 (1982), and Dennis v. Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980), such that execution of that judgment is an unreasonable seizure under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Fraud on the Court and Inherent Equitable Power. Whether federal courts possess the inherent equitable power, as established in Marshall v. Holmes, 141 U.S. 589 (1891), and Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944), and preserved by Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(d), to entertain independent actions to