Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Monica Miller, et al. v. Letitia James, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Attorney General of New York

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 24-2785 · judgment April 9, 2025


Certiorari denied · December 8, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

During a press conference convened by the New York Attorney General to announce the filing of a civil lawsuit against Red Rose Rescue, a pro-life organization, and several of its members, the Attorney General declared that the organization was a “terrorist group” and that those associated with the organization were “terrorists.” There were no allegations of terrorism in the civil lawsuit, and neither Red Rose Rescue nor anyone associated with the organization has ever been charged with the crime of terrorism nor any other violent felony. The Attorney General’s appellation was designed to malign Red Rose Rescue and its associates in the eyes of the public and to reduce the effectiveness of their First Amendment activities.

  1. Do Petitioners, who are members of Red Rose Rescue, have standing to advance their constitutional challenge to the actions of the Attorney General when they have alleged a chilling effect on their First Amendment rights and reputational harm?

  2. A re the Attorney General’s “terrorist” and “terrorist group” designations opinion protected by the First Amendment and thus immune from New York’s defamation law?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Robert Joseph Muise
American Freedom Law Center

For respondent
Barbara Dale Underwood
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. Dec 08 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 12 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/5/2025.
  3. Nov 05 2025
    Reply of petitioners Monica Miller, et al. filed.
  4. Oct 24 2025
    Brief of respondent Letitia James in opposition filed.
  5. Sep 19 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 24, 2025.
  6. Sep 18 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 24, 2025 to October 24, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Aug 25 2025
    Response Requested. (Due September 24, 2025)
  8. Aug 20 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
  9. Aug 13 2025
    Waiver of right of respondent Letitia James to respond filed.
  10. Jul 28 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 29, 2025)