Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

United States v. Cotter Corp., N.S.L.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2023-1826 · judgment February 10, 2025


Certiorari denied · May 26, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 17% cert probability (95% interval 11%–25%)

Before the decision, about 4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a federal-government petitioner, counsel who has won certiorari before, and a Federal Circuit decision below, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

The Price-Anderson Act, Pub. L. No. 85-256, 71 Stat. 576, authorized the federal government to “enter into agreements of indemnification with its contractors” under “contracts for the benefit of the United States involving activities under the risk of public liability for a substantial nuclear incident,” in order to provide government indemnification against “public liability arising out of or in connection with the contractual activity.” § 4, 71 Stat. 577 (42 U.S.C. 2210(d) (1964)). In this case, respondent is not a government contractor. It is instead a private, downstream purchaser of nuclear material that was originally produced under a contract between the government and another party for the benefit of the United States’ atomic-weapons program, but the government then sold the material “as is” to yet another party, and the material passed through still more private hands before respondent purchased the material for its own benefit and then allegedly mishandled the material. The question presented is as follows: Whether a downstream purchaser’s liability for mishandling nuclear material that the purchaser obtained for private benefit, but that was originally produced more than a decade earlier under a government contract with another party, is subject to indemnification by the United States under the original government contract because it qualifies as “public liability arising out of or in connection with the contractual activity” under 42 U.S.C. 2210(d). (I)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
D. John Sauer
Solicitor General

For respondent
Lisa S. Blatt
Williams & Connolly LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A790

Proceedings

  1. May 26 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 05 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2026.
  3. May 05 2026
    Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
  4. Apr 21 2026
    Brief of respondent Cotter Corp., N.S.L. in opposition filed.
  5. Mar 23 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 27, 2026)
  6. Feb 09 2026
    Application (25A790) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until March 23, 2026.
  7. Feb 06 2026
    Application (25A790) to extend further the time from February 23, 2026 to March 23, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.
  8. Jan 09 2026
    Application (25A790) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until February 23, 2026.
  9. Jan 08 2026
    Application (25A790) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 22, 2026 to February 23, 2026, submitted to The Chief Justice.