Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
James Ethridge v. Samsung SDI Company, Limited
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-40094 · judgment December 15, 2025
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Fifth Circuit decision below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below, and down for a business respondent.
Question presented
When a company directly and regularly sells a product into a state, and that product causes injury in the state to one of the state’s residents, does the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause forbid the state from exercising personal jurisdiction over the company solely because the company took steps to limit sales only to some purchasers, for some uses, within the state?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jonathan Ellis Taylor
Gupta Wessler LLP
For respondent
Roy T. Englert Jr.
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer (US) LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- Jun 29 2026Petition DENIED.
- Jun 09 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2026.
- May 05 2026Rescheduled.
- Apr 22 2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/14/2026.
- Apr 22 2026Brief amicus curiae of American Association for Justice filed. (Distributed)
- Apr 21 2026Reply of petitioner James Ethridge filed. (Distributed)
- Apr 03 2026Brief of respondent Samsung SDI Co., Ltd. in support filed.
- Mar 16 2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2026)