Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Gopher Media LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation, fka Local Clicks, dba Doctor Multimedia, et al. v. Andrew Melone, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 24-2626 · judgment October 9, 2025


Certiorari denied · June 15, 2026
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

“[A]ll final decisions” are appealable. 28 U.S.C. §1291. Whether a decision to deny a “pretrial request to dismiss” is final “will generally turn on whether the defendant has asserted a defense to liability or instead an immunity from suit.” GEO Grp., Inc. v. Menocal, 607 U.S. ___, 2026 WL 513536, at *4 (Feb. 25, 2026). Unlike liability defenses, immunities from suit are “irretrievably lost once trial occurs” because their “essence” is a right to “avoid[], in addition to liability, all the usual ‘burdens of litigation,’ including a trial.” Id. at *5. California was the first of thirty-nine states to provide Americans with statutory “anti-SLAPP” rights to avoid “harassment and burdens of litigation” targeting speech. Varian Med. Sys., Inc. v. Delfino, 106 P.3d 958, 967 (Cal. 2005). The circuits are divided on whether pretrial denials of such rights are immediately appealable. The en banc Ninth Circuit held they are not, departing from a majority of circuits holding they are. The question presented is: Whether a pretrial denial of rights conferred by California’s anti-SLAPP law is immediately appealable.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Chase Andrew Cobern
Munck Wilson Mandala, LLP

For respondent
Owen M. Praskievicz
Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith, LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Linked docket
25A685

Proceedings

  1. Jun 15 2026
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 05 2026
    Reply of petitioners Gopher Media, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  3. May 26 2026
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2026.
  4. May 11 2026
    Brief of respondents Andrew Melone, et al. in opposition filed.
  5. Apr 03 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 11, 2026.
  6. Apr 02 2026
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 9, 2026 to May 11, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Mar 06 2026
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 9, 2026)
  8. Dec 11 2025
    Application (25A685) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 8, 2026.
  9. Dec 09 2025
    Application (25A685) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 7, 2026 to March 8, 2026, submitted to Justice Kagan.