Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Olympic Collection, Inc., et al. v. Aklilu Yohannes
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-36059 · judgment August 13, 2024
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a business petitioner.
Question presented
Whether Petitioner Akilu Yohannes’s (“Yohannes”) challenge to an interlocutory order provides a basis for certiorari. W hether cer tiorar i should be g ranted where considerations governing review on certiorari under Rule 10 have not been met. The following questions for a conditional cross-petition of Respondents Olympic Collection, Inc., Farooq Ansari, Susan Cable, and Norman Martin (collectively “Olympic”), apply only if certiorari were to be granted. Whether Olympic is a private collection agency that is not a state actor for purposes of a due process claim. Whether an as-applied due process claim can be brought based on an alleged failure to follow a state statute. Whether this lawsuit should be dismissed if the sole remaining claim is dismissed. Whether the Court should grant certiorari on crosspetition to determine to answer the above questions.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Marc Rosenberg
Lee, Smart, PS, Inc.
For respondent
Aklilu Yohannes
Proceedings
- Apr 28 2025Petition DENIED.
- Apr 09 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
- Mar 18 2025Waiver of right of respondent Aklilu Yohannes to respond filed.
- Feb 24 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 3, 2025)