Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arturo S. Lopez, Sr. v. Frank Kendall, Secretary of the Air Force, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 23-50844 · judgment June 14, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Petitioner Pro-Se respectfully presents his ques tions and respectfully requests that the U.S Supreme court intervene to help preserve the Rule of Law the 5th and 14th Amendments. The Right to due process and fairness. All People are equal before the Law in reference to violations of C.F.R’s “Codified Federal Regulations”. These Rules are considered legally binding just as any statute and are backed by our U.S Constitution. Published in the Federal Register and governed by the Administrative Procedure Act “APA” These C.F.R’s are set in place to protect all Federal Employees from any unfair, non-impartial due process. Any individual or Agency that violates any C.F.R must be held accountable to maintain a fair justice system for everyone. Agencies and courts should not be allowed to ignore and not follow what a C.F.R states. C.F.R. Violations impact all Federal employees bringing forth their case and unfairly prevent and deprive them from having the ability to receive his or her Civil Procedure rights to justice and the ability to defend themselves fairly without prejudice or bias in accordance with the C.F.R Regulations. An action denying the process that is due “would be unconstitu tional”. Process is due if rights are involved. 1. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R 1614.105 a(2) Does this C.F.R allow the petitioner or any Federal employee to file his or her complaint after they have clearly proven that they were unaware of the date and time the Dis criminatory action had occurred against them, and after they have clearly asserted a defense of Estoppel.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Arturo S. Lopez Sr.
For respondent
Sarah M. Harris
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Mar 31 2025Petition DENIED.
- Mar 12 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2025.
- Mar 06 2025Waiver of right of respondent Federal Respondents to respond filed.
- Sep 03 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2025)