Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Richard Lee Rynn v. Craig Jennings, Judge, Avondale City Court, et al.
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Arizona, No. CV-24-0032-SA · judgment May 14, 2024
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does the legal standard of evidence require a showing of imminent harm to justify the issuance of an ex parte injunction without notice?
-
Are employees legally protected from a work place injunction based on a labor dispute without authorization of the workplace and under actions directed by employer?
-
Is a workplace injunction void for not following labor rights protections required by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and EEOC including the right to disclosure? PARTIES TO PROCEEDING AVONDALE COURT CRAIG JENNINGS, STATE OF ARIZONA, CITY OF AVONDALE, SHAYLEY MATHEWS, PATRICK CAMUNEZ, FIRST TRANSIT Rynn V Craig Jennings, First Transit, Et A1 Avondale City Court Case No. P02019000235 Superior Court Case No. LC2022-000265 Superior Court Case No.CV-2022-011208 Arizona Court of Appeals Case No. 1 CA-CV 23-0092 ARIZONA SUPREME COURT Case No. CV-24-0032
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Richard Rynn
For respondent
Stephen Mark Kemp
Office of the City Attorney, City of Avondale
Proceedings
- Jun 16 2025Rehearing DENIED.
- May 27 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/12/2025.
- May 16 2025Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Apr 21 2025Petition DENIED.
- Apr 01 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/17/2025.
- Mar 04 2025Waiver of right of respondent First Transit, Inc. and Patrick Camunez to respond filed.
- Oct 11 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2025)
- Aug 02 2024Application (24A121) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until October 11, 2024.
- Jul 27 2024Application (24A121) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 12, 2024 to October 11, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.