Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Johnny Moats, Sheriff, Polk County, Georgia, et al. v. Stephen Jarrard

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 23-10332 · judgment September 16, 2024


Certiorari denied · May 19, 2025
Pre-decision estimate: 9% cert probability (95% interval 5%–15%)

Before the decision, about 2.2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Question presented

This qualified immunity case concerns the proper First Amendment analysis for a claim by a volunteer applicant to a jail religious ministry program operated by a Georgia sheriff. The program employs volunteers to provide religious ministry to local jail inmates. Respondent was denied admission to the program. Seven circuits have applied the Court’s Pickering-Garcetti framework to First Amendment claims by volunteers who apply to or serve in government programs. See Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U. S. 410 (2006); Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205, 391 U.S. 563 (1968). Here, however, the Eleventh Circuit held that the unique circumstances of this case rendered the Pickering-Garcetti framework inapplicable. Instead, the Eleventh Circuit applied First Amendment forum analysis, under which the court held (1) viewpoint discrimination is prohibited and (2) the unbridled discretion doctrine required jail policies to contain specific criteria to guide officials’ decisions. Accordingly, the questions presented are: 1. Whether the Court’s Pickering-Garcetti framework applies to a First Amendment claim by an applicant for volunteer religious work in a local jail’s program for inmates.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Terry E. Williams
Williams, Morris & Blum, LLC

For respondent
John Archer Meiser
Lindsay and Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 19 2025
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Apr 23 2025
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025.
  3. Apr 04 2025
    Brief of respondent Stephen Jarrard in opposition filed.
  4. Mar 10 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 4, 2025.
  5. Mar 07 2025
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 21, 2025 to April 4, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Feb 07 2025
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2025)